Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 455 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regina G. Barber results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Hasty Generalization , and Anchoring Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 233 hits . Analysis detected 1,754 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,428 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 86% (1,342 of 9,471 authors). This Regina G. Barber is worse (more manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group. Regina G. Barber
Author details
Total words: 1,428
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.8% percentile 4.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.3% 16.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 10.4% 10.4% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Author 5.8% 5.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 6.2% 6.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 8.2% 8.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.9%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 10.4%, sitewide 0.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 8.2%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.2%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Nature: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst