Author summary
95% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,236 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Raphael Satter results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 590 hits . Analysis detected 6,049 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,792 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,440 of 8,806 authors). This Raphael Satter is worse (more manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group. Raphael Satter
Author details
Total words: 3,792
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.7% percentile 4.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.6% 15.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 7.1% 7.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 8.9% 8.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 8.9% 8.9% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 5.4% 5.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 7.2% 7.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 11.9%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.6%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 4.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 3.7% Burden of Proof: Author 7.1%, sitewide 0.4% Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst