Author summary
63% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,437 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phil Corso results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 670 hits . Analysis detected 4,662 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,928 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 45% (5,218 of 9,471 authors). This Phil Corso is better (less manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group. Phil Corso
Author details
Total words: 6,928
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst