Author summary
72% 1 analyzed article/video 903 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pete Hammond results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hindsight Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 558 hits . Analysis detected 2,969 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,612 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,600 of 9,487 authors). This Pete Hammond is worse (more manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group. Pete Hammond
Author details
Total words: 3,612
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.1% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.0% 15.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 15.4% 15.4% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 9.7% 9.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 15.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Horn Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.0% Primacy Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst