Author summary
44% 3 analyzed articles/videos 5,012 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patt Morrison results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 2,079 hits . Analysis detected 13,048 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,048 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 28% (6,831 of 9,471 authors). This Patt Morrison is better (less manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group. Patt Morrison
Author details
Total words: 20,048
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.9% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles20K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.4% 10.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst