Author summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video270 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Noah Smith results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Framing Effect, and False Dilemma, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 108 hits. Analysis detected 440 faulty-reasoning hits from 810 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (332 of 9,471 authors). This Noah Smith is worse (more manipulative) than 96.50% of the peer group.
Noah Smith
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠97%Noah Smith (selected)11%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 810
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

97% percentile
025507510096.5% percentile
10.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles810 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.6%11.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 9.6%9.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 13.3%13.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 12.6%12.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Author 9.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos