Author summary
⁠3%1 analyzed article/video181 analyzed words
BS Summary: These NHPR Staff results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Loss Aversion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 182 faulty-reasoning hits from 724 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (2,019 of 8,706 authors). This NHPR Staff is worse (more manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group.
NHPR Staff
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠77%NHPR Staff (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 724
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

77% percentile
025507510076.8% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles724 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.4%2.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.0%4.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 4.0%4.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 3.6%3.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos