Heavy rain prompts flash flood warning in southern NH 4%

By NHPR Staff3%

8/3/2026, 4:14:46 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 6 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Indoctrination, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 156 faulty-reasoning hits from 181 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 11.2% and a BS Rank of 4% (26,462 of 27,322 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 96.90% of the article peer group.

The National Weather Service issued a flash flood warning for southern New Hampshire until 11:15 a.m. 
Monday. 
The warning covered a territory that includes southeastern Merrimack County, as well as southwestern Strafford, southern Hillsborough, and Rockingham counties. 
This includes Manchester, Nashua, Derry, Merrimack, Durham, Exeter Salem, Northwood and Bedford. 
The National Weather Service reported that up to 2 ½ inches of rain fell by 8 a.m., and the expected rainfall was 1-3 inches in one hour. 
A flash flood warning is issued when a flash flood is either imminent or occurring, according to the weather service. 
It recommends people in flood prone areas move immediately to higher ground. 
Public safety officials urge people to turn around and do not drive on or through flooded roads. 
Heavy rainfall in the southern part of the state follows severe thunderstorms last week, leading to flooding in Manchester on Tuesday that made some roads impassable. 
In June, Gov. 
Kelly Ayotte requested a major disaster declaration following flooding in Carroll County that washed out bridges and roads. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 2.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 2.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 16.0%NHPR Staff: 4.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 4.6%Framing Effect16.0%This article: 16.0%NHPR Staff: 4.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.0%Loss Aversion16.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 2.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 9.4%NHPR Staff: 2.3%New Hampshire Public Radio: 4.4%Negativity Bias9.4%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 3.6%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 2.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 2.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 3.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 14.4%NHPR Staff: 3.6%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)14.4%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 14.4%NHPR Staff: 3.6%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.9%Unattributed Quote14.4%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.0%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 16.0%NHPR Staff: 4.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.3%Indoctrination16.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NHPR Staff: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

181 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers21%attributed speech143writer words
0%flagged-word coverage
20 attributed words53% of attributed speech38% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Indoctrination-20.3 ptsWriter: 20.3%National Weather Service: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-18.2 ptsWriter: 18.2%National Weather Service: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.