Author summary
4% 9 analyzed articles/videos 3,690 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mitchell Kukulka results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 3.7% saturation with 575 hits . Analysis detected 3,233 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,554 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 3% (9,127 of 9,336 authors). This Mitchell Kukulka is better (less manipulative) than 97.80% of the peer group. Mitchell Kukulka
Author details
Total words: 15,554
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.2% percentile 0.8% BS Score9 analyzed articles15.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst