Author summary
7%5 analyzed articles/videos1,295 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jiquanda Johnson results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Representativeness Heuristic, and Availability Heuristic, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 235 hits. Analysis detected 1,496 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,180 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 14% (7,641 of 8,803 authors). This Jiquanda Johnson is better (less manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group.
Jiquanda Johnson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
14%Jiquanda Johnson (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,180
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

13% percentile
025507510013.2% percentile
1.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.2%0.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.5%4.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Middle Ground: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate