Author summary
95%8 analyzed articles/videos5,712 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Hayes results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 3,394 hits. Analysis detected 27,585 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,343 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 56% (4,260 of 9,487 authors). This Mike Hayes is worse (more manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group.
Mike Hayes
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
56%Mike Hayes (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 23,343
Article count: 8
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

55% percentile
025507510055.1% percentile
2.4% BS Score8 analyzed articles23.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.5%14.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.4%11.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.4%5.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 11.3%11.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 14.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate