Author summary
88% 8 analyzed articles/videos 3,894 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Louis C. Hochman results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 2,200 hits . Analysis detected 16,381 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,452 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 48% (4,934 of 9,484 authors). This Louis C. Hochman is better (less manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group. Louis C. Hochman
Author details
Total words: 17,452
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.0% percentile 2.1% BS Score8 analyzed articles17.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.6% 12.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst