Author summary
47% 2 analyzed articles/videos 6,073 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meredith Nierman results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 1,451 hits . Analysis detected 12,306 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,292 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 47% (5,036 of 9,471 authors). This Meredith Nierman is better (less manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group. Meredith Nierman
Author details
Total words: 16,292
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.8% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles16.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst