Author summary
88% 1 analyzed article/video 565 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Max Grinstein results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Negativity Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 281 hits . Analysis detected 1,947 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,260 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 66% (3,273 of 9,485 authors). This Max Grinstein is worse (more manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group. Max Grinstein
Author details
Total words: 2,260
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.5% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 12.4% 12.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 12.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 11.9%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst