Author summary
0%6 analyzed articles/videos9,791 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Olalde results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 4,340 hits. Analysis detected 31,610 faulty-reasoning hits from 49,648 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 16% (7,318 of 8,626 authors). This Mark Olalde is better (less manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group.
Mark Olalde
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
16%Mark Olalde (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 49,648
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

15% percentile
025507510015.2% percentile
1.3% BS Score6 analyzed articles49.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate