Author summary
43%1 analyzed article/video242 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Madeleine Long results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 170 hits. Analysis detected 658 faulty-reasoning hits from 968 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 89% (1,083 of 9,471 authors). This Madeleine Long is worse (more manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group.
Madeleine Long
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
89%Madeleine Long (selected)6%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 968
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

89% percentile
025507510088.6% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles968 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.5%6.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 13.9%13.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 17.6%17.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.1%8.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.2%1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 4.3%4.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 4.7%4.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 17.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Author 13.9%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos