Author summary
59% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,369 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luay Ghafari results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Optimism Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 576 hits . Analysis detected 3,519 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,476 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 51% (4,702 of 9,471 authors). This Luay Ghafari is worse (more manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group. Luay Ghafari
Author details
Total words: 5,476
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Author 9.9%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst