Author summary
⁠32%1 analyzed article/video943 analyzed words
BS Summary: These LINDSEY WASSON results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Loss Aversion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 186 hits. Analysis detected 1,710 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,772 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (6,086 of 8,528 authors). This LINDSEY WASSON is better (less manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group.
LINDSEY WASSON
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠29%LINDSEY WASSON (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,772
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

29% percentile
025507510028.6% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.7%4.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.5%Burden of Proof: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos