Author summary
42%2 analyzed articles/videos1,370 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ed White results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Pessimism Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 211 hits. Analysis detected 1,877 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,199 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 24% (6,564 of 8,557 authors). This Ed White is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group.
Ed White
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
24%Ed White (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,199
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

23% percentile
025507510023.3% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos