Author summary
96%1 analyzed article/video1,268 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leonid Ragozin results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 41.5% saturation with 2,106 hits. Analysis detected 9,373 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,072 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 88% (1,130 of 8,838 authors). This Leonid Ragozin is worse (more manipulative) than 87.20% of the peer group.
Leonid Ragozin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
88%Leonid Ragozin (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,072
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

87% percentile
025507510087.2% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 41.5%41.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 19.4%19.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 18.4%18.4%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 11.5%11.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 7.9%7.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 41.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 19.4%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Author 15.9%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 18.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.1%, sitewide 15.9%Straw Man: Author 11.5%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos