Author summary
36% 1 analyzed article/video 1,107 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laya Neelakandan results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 471 hits . Analysis detected 2,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,428 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 52% (4,571 of 9,471 authors). This Laya Neelakandan is worse (more manipulative) than 51.70% of the peer group. Laya Neelakandan
Author details
Total words: 4,428
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.7% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.6% 10.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.6%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Composition/Division: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Circular Reasoning: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst