Author summary
56% 1 analyzed article/video 917 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kristen Lopez results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias , Optimism Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 554 hits . Analysis detected 2,628 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,668 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 63% (3,551 of 9,483 authors). This Kristen Lopez is worse (more manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group. Kristen Lopez
Author details
Total words: 3,668
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.6% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 12.6% 12.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.1% 15.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Red Herring: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst