Author summary
19% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,755 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kevin Cheek results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 432 hits . Analysis detected 3,195 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,368 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 31% (6,341 of 9,078 authors). This Kevin Cheek is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group. Kevin Cheek
Author details
Total words: 7,368
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score6 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst