Author summary
79% 1 analyzed article/video 1,193 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kat Bryant Knudson results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 425 hits . Analysis detected 3,678 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,772 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 61% (3,747 of 9,471 authors). This Kat Bryant Knudson is worse (more manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group. Kat Bryant Knudson
Author details
Total words: 4,772
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.4% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.8% 5.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Loss Aversion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 2.5% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst