Author summary
78% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,239 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justin Enriquez results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 2,489 hits . Analysis detected 13,527 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,540 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 51% (4,657 of 9,480 authors). This Justin Enriquez is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group. Justin Enriquez
Author details
Total words: 15,540
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles15.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.6% 13.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst