Author summary
94% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,141 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia Dzurillay results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Anecdotal , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 512 hits . Analysis detected 4,769 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,564 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 71% (2,715 of 9,192 authors). This Julia Dzurillay is worse (more manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group. Julia Dzurillay
Author details
Total words: 4,564
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.5% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.1% 9.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.4% 6.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.5% 7.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.7% 8.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 7.7%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 7.7%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.5%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst