Author summary
47% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,129 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judith Martin results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 377 hits . Analysis detected 3,119 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,516 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 47% (4,637 of 8,752 authors). This Judith Martin is better (less manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group. Judith Martin
Author details
Total words: 4,516
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.0% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.3% 8.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.3%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst