Author summary
46% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,129 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jacobina Martin results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 584 hits . Analysis detected 3,683 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,175 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 37% (5,997 of 9,471 authors). This Jacobina Martin is better (less manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group. Jacobina Martin
Author details
Total words: 6,175
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.7% percentile 1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.5% 9.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Author 9.5%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst