Author summary
28% 1 analyzed article/video 394 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Vanian results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 236 hits . Analysis detected 655 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,576 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 86% (1,275 of 8,852 authors). This Jonathan Vanian is worse (more manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group. Jonathan Vanian
Author details
Total words: 1,576
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.6% percentile 4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.0% 15.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.2% 6.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 7.4% 7.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst