Author summary
97% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,664 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Daniel Davidson results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 3,800 hits . Analysis detected 34,044 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,656 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,938 of 9,459 authors). This John Daniel Davidson is worse (more manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group. John Daniel Davidson
Author details
Total words: 18,656
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.5% percentile 3.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles18.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 19.2% 19.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 20.4% 20.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 19.2% 19.2% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 12.5% 12.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.7% 12.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 19.2%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 19.2%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Slippery Slope: Author 12.5%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst