Author summary
66% 1 analyzed article/video 689 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Nolan results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 351 hits . Analysis detected 1,980 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,756 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 72% (2,717 of 9,471 authors). This Joe Nolan is worse (more manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group. Joe Nolan
Author details
Total words: 2,756
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.3% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.7% 12.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 2.0% 2.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Primacy Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Circular Reasoning: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.1% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst