Author summary
66%3 analyzed articles/videos2,294 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joanna Kakissis results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 749 hits. Analysis detected 7,036 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,176 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 39% (5,799 of 9,471 authors). This Joanna Kakissis is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Joanna Kakissis
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
39%Joanna Kakissis (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,176
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

39% percentile
025507510038.8% percentile
1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.2%2.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate