Author summary
69%2 analyzed articles/videos1,716 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeff Marks results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Hindsight Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 654 hits. Analysis detected 5,516 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,864 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 61% (3,626 of 9,194 authors). This Jeff Marks is worse (more manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group.
Jeff Marks
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
61%Jeff Marks (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,864
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

61% percentile
025507510060.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.5%9.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 5.4%5.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.1%9.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.8%1.8%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Author 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos