Author summary
69% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,716 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeff Marks results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Optimism Bias , and Hindsight Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 654 hits . Analysis detected 5,516 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,864 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 61% (3,626 of 9,194 authors). This Jeff Marks is worse (more manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group. Jeff Marks
Author details
Total words: 6,864
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.6% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.5% 9.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.4% 5.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.1% 9.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Author 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 6.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst