Author summary
35% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,329 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jamie Stengle results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 1,673 hits . Analysis detected 9,168 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,388 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 17% (7,356 of 8,822 authors). This Jamie Stengle is better (less manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group. Jamie Stengle
Author details
Total words: 18,388
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.6% percentile 1.3% BS Score7 analyzed articles18.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst