Author summary
67% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,487 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Faris results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 488 hits . Analysis detected 4,443 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,948 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 43% (5,446 of 9,471 authors). This James Faris is better (less manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group. James Faris
Author details
Total words: 5,948
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 8.2% 8.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst