Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 5,005 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ivy Buck results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.3% saturation with 3,798 hits . Analysis detected 20,440 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,454 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 85% (1,502 of 9,471 authors). This Ivy Buck is worse (more manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group. Ivy Buck
Author details
Total words: 14,454
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.1% percentile 4.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 17.8% 17.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.0% 12.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 26.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 17.8%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 12.1%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Author 9.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst