Author summary
42% 1 analyzed article/video 594 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Isabelle Johannessen results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Loss Aversion , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 184 hits . Analysis detected 1,606 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,376 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 61% (3,610 of 9,195 authors). This Isabelle Johannessen is worse (more manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group. Isabelle Johannessen
Author details
Total words: 2,376
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.7% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 6.5% 6.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 6.8% 6.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Loss Aversion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 2.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.5%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% No True Scotsman: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst