Author summary
1%1 analyzed article/video326 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iliana Limón Romero results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Representativeness Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.3% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 103 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 28% (6,709 of 9,200 authors). This Iliana Limón Romero is better (less manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group.
Iliana Limón Romero
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
28%Iliana Limón Romero (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,304
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

27% percentile
025507510027.1% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.3%3.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos