Author summary
87% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,218 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hunter Woodall results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 1,441 hits . Analysis detected 10,518 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,262 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 54% (4,050 of 8,764 authors). This Hunter Woodall is worse (more manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group. Hunter Woodall
Author details
Total words: 10,262
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.0% 14.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.1% 12.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst