Author summary
88% 1 analyzed article/video 532 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hugh Son results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Confirmation Bias , with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 22.8% saturation with 486 hits . Analysis detected 1,959 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,128 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,572 of 9,471 authors). This Hugh Son is worse (more manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group. Hugh Son
Author details
Total words: 2,128
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.4% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 22.8% 22.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 13.3% 13.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 22.8%, sitewide 1.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Circular Reasoning: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst