Author summary
87% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,379 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Bates results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 1,330 hits . Analysis detected 7,399 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,593 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,786 of 9,465 authors). This Hannah Bates is worse (more manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group. Hannah Bates
Author details
Total words: 5,593
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.1% percentile 3.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 23.8% 23.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 18.0% 18.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.0% 9.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.7% 11.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 18.0%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 23.8%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Straw Man: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst