Author summary
34% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,994 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gustavo Arellano results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Indoctrination , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 559 hits . Analysis detected 5,191 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,417 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 13% (7,610 of 8,737 authors). This Gustavo Arellano is better (less manipulative) than 87.10% of the peer group. Gustavo Arellano
Author details
Total words: 10,417
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.9% percentile 1.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst