Author summary
29% 1 analyzed article/video 1,460 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Glenn Daigon results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 554 hits . Analysis detected 2,390 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,840 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 37% (6,077 of 9,520 authors). This Glenn Daigon is better (less manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group. Glenn Daigon
Author details
Total words: 5,840
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 9.5% 9.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst