Author summary
66%1 analyzed article/video601 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gabrielle Fonrouge results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 271 hits. Analysis detected 1,942 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 78% (1,936 of 8,694 authors). This Gabrielle Fonrouge is worse (more manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group.
Gabrielle Fonrouge
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
78%Gabrielle Fonrouge (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,404
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

78% percentile
025507510077.7% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.2%3.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.3%11.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 7.2%7.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 9.7%9.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 11.0%11.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 7.2%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.9%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos