Author summary
56% 1 analyzed article/video 823 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Evelyn Cheng results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Halo Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 323 hits . Analysis detected 2,210 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 50% (4,408 of 8,683 authors). This Evelyn Cheng is better (less manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group. Evelyn Cheng
Author details
Total words: 3,292
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.2% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 9.8% 9.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst