Author summary
⁠96%5 analyzed articles/videos2,493 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ethan Strimling results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.7% saturation with 3,124 hits. Analysis detected 20,607 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,274 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (1,653 of 9,435 authors). This Ethan Strimling is worse (more manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group.
Ethan Strimling
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠83%Ethan Strimling (selected)5%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 11,274
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

83% percentile
025507510082.5% percentile
4.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 27.7%27.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 22.6%22.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.7%13.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.3%1.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 8.5%8.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.8%12.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 19.9%19.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 27.7%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 13.7%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 22.6%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Author 19.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Author 8.5%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos