Author summary
37%1 analyzed article/video1,173 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Wessan results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 194 hits. Analysis detected 2,168 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,692 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 24% (7,200 of 9,471 authors). This Eric Wessan is better (less manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group.
Eric Wessan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
24%Eric Wessan (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,692
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

24% percentile
025507510024.0% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.7%3.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos