Author summary
⁠32%4 analyzed articles/videos868 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diego Pineda results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 454 hits. Analysis detected 3,819 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,180 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (6,564 of 9,471 authors). This Diego Pineda is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
Diego Pineda
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠31%Diego Pineda (selected)2%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,180
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

31% percentile
025507510030.7% percentile
1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos