Author summary
91% 4 analyzed articles/videos 686 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deb Sayer results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 533 hits . Analysis detected 4,465 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,744 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,605 of 8,538 authors). This Deb Sayer is worse (more manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group. Deb Sayer
Author details
Total words: 2,744
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.2% percentile 4.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.4% 19.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.9% 14.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 12.7% 12.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.6% 9.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.7% 13.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.9%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 13.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.6%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.2%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 9.8%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Primacy Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.9% Straw Man: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst