Follow the money, which leads to Susan Collins | Letter 90%

By Deb Sayer91%

8/1/2026, 2:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 71.4% saturation with 135 hits. Analysis detected 940 faulty-reasoning hits from 189 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 78.3% and a BS Rank of 90% (2,838 of 26,476 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 89.30% of the article peer group.

If people consider nothing else in the November election for our U.S. senator, it’s worth pausing to carefully consider the findings of an investigation by the Maine Monitor, published in the Portland Press Herald (“Nearly 100 billionaires and their spouses have donated to reelect Susan Collins,” June 12). 
Between January 2025 and May 2026, at least 79 billionaires  97, including spouses  donated $9.8 million to Collins’ campaign network. 
Not one is a Maine resident. 
These billionaire donors supporting Collins have a net worth of $888 billion, or nearly nine times Maine’s entire economic output in 2025. 
CQ Roll Call found our so-called “moderate” Senator voted with President Trump 94.6% of the time in 2025. 
These billionaires backing Collins aren’t investing $9.8 million by accident. 
So voters are entitled to ask: Why are all these out-of-state billionaires supporting Susan Collins? 
What do they get out of it? 
The answer is clear: billionaires want what Susan Collins will deliver to them  and 94.6% of the time in 2025, that meant supporting Trump’s plutocratic agenda. 
Nancy Fannon 
South Portland 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 71.4%Deb Sayer: 10.8%The Portland Press Herald: 2.2%Confirmation Bias71.4%This article: 11.6%Deb Sayer: 3.1%The Portland Press Herald: 1.0%Anchoring Bias11.6%This article: 23.3%Deb Sayer: 3.2%The Portland Press Herald: 2.6%Availability Heuristic23.3%This article: 3.2%Deb Sayer: 1.2%The Portland Press Herald: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic3.2%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 1.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 9.0%Deb Sayer: 14.9%The Portland Press Herald: 3.6%Framing Effect9.0%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 1.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 2.7%The Portland Press Herald: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 0.8%The Portland Press Herald: 4.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 19.6%Deb Sayer: 2.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.9%Pessimism Bias19.6%This article: 62.4%Deb Sayer: 13.7%The Portland Press Herald: 3.0%Negativity Bias62.4%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Deb Sayer: 2.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error5.3%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 2.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 1.1%The Portland Press Herald: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 0.7%The Portland Press Herald: 3.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 1.6%The Portland Press Herald: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.5%Deb Sayer: 1.4%The Portland Press Herald: 1.8%Recency Bias9.5%This article: 11.6%Deb Sayer: 3.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.4%Primacy Effect11.6%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 3.9%The Portland Press Herald: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 2.8%The Portland Press Herald: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 34.9%Deb Sayer: 8.2%The Portland Press Herald: 2.6%Appeal to Authority34.9%This article: 6.9%Deb Sayer: 0.8%The Portland Press Herald: 0.7%False Dilemma6.9%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 16.9%Deb Sayer: 6.3%The Portland Press Herald: 2.0%Hasty Generalization16.9%This article: 5.3%Deb Sayer: 0.4%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Red Herring5.3%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 1.2%The Portland Press Herald: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 25.9%Deb Sayer: 9.6%The Portland Press Herald: 3.0%Appeal to Emotion25.9%This article: 7.9%Deb Sayer: 3.8%The Portland Press Herald: 0.8%Begging the Question7.9%This article: 23.8%Deb Sayer: 1.6%The Portland Press Herald: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)23.8%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 25.4%Deb Sayer: 2.3%The Portland Press Herald: 0.3%Burden of Proof25.4%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 0.4%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 0.3%The Portland Press Herald: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 3.3%The Portland Press Herald: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 25.9%Deb Sayer: 3.2%The Portland Press Herald: 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)25.9%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 5.3%Deb Sayer: 0.4%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Special Pleading5.3%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 1.8%The Portland Press Herald: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 27.5%Deb Sayer: 19.4%The Portland Press Herald: 4.9%Biased Writer Voice27.5%This article: 19.6%Deb Sayer: 9.8%The Portland Press Herald: 1.8%Indoctrination19.6%This article: 45.0%Deb Sayer: 12.7%The Portland Press Herald: 1.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias45.0%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 2.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Deb Sayer: 2.3%The Portland Press Herald: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

189 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.